From Spark to System
We look at Capability Building, more like experiential learning—applying concepts in real-world scenarios while balancing (AI-saturated) results-driven efficiency with human sense-making.
This blog series delves deeper into the intersection of technology and human development, highlighting how you can build your resilient adaptiveness to thrive in this modern age.
How Human Capability Governs AI-Enabled Innovation
Artificial intelligence isn’t just about crunching data faster—it’s rewriting what’s possible. Yet, as companies chase the next shiny AI tool, they risk overlooking the real engine of innovation: people. In this article, we’ll explore how generative AI can fuel creativity—and why unlocking its potential demands a sociotechnical approach that builds human capability, not just machine muscle.
Rethinking Creativity
From Knowledge to Imagination
For decades, organizations prized “knowledge workers” who process information. Today, the game has changed: we need creative workers who imagine new possibilities. Creativity is that spark of “what if…?”, while innovation is taking action on it. As John Cutler might ask: What problem are we really solving? Shifting from know-how to imagination means leaders must nurture diversity of thought, embrace uncertainty, and give people room to experiment—because you can’t script an unknown future.
AI as Catalyst, Not Creator
Generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion don’t replace our brains; they extend them. They help us:
Explore wild connections (e.g., “phantafly”: half-elephant, half-butterfly)*
Merge and refine ideas (combining dynamic packaging, donation apps, and education into a unified food-waste solution)
Visualize futures in seconds (from crab-inspired toys to dragonfly-like flying cars)
But here’s the catch: AI gives you raw material—it doesn’t craft the narrative or decide which ideas matter. That’s still on us. We need people who ask the right questions and apply metrics to steer a project. AI fuels divergent thinking; humans converge on what works.
*An illustration of this capability demonstrates the design chimeric creatures, such as the Phantafly, which combines elements of an elephant and a butterfly which can inspire the design of chocolates, cakes, brooches, and more. Using AI for product design is next-level; see my previous post. Its easy toolwise to try something similar—developed packaging concepts… but don’t just go for the quickfix experimentation; I challenge you to augment with empathy; not bureaucracy gadgets.
The Three Waves of AI
And Why Waves 1 & 2 Aren’t Enough
Board of Innovation frames AI adoption in three waves:
Efficiency (do today’s tasks faster/cheaper)
Quality (make solutions better)
Transformation (create entirely new systems)
Most organizations get stuck optimizing Wave 1 or 2: automating reports, tweaking models, shaving milliseconds. But real breakthrough—Wave 3—happens when we rethink how we operate. That’s where a human capability system comes in: training people to curate AI outputs, building cross-functional teams that self-steer, and embedding continuous learning loops. In other words, you need to build for tomorrow’s problems, not just today’s.
The Leader’s New Job:
Building Capability, Not Commanding Tasks
In traditional hierarchies, managers assign tasks. In a creative ecosystem, they become capability builders. Think of yourself as hosting a sustained innovation jam:
Nurture diversity: Mix roles, backgrounds, and skills.
Open boundaries: Share ideas freely—inside and outside your org.
Give credit: Track contributions with “idea credits” and internal markets.
Protect experimentation: Carve out Exploration Days where teams prototype without fear.
Measure wisely: Align on a few key metrics—novelty, feasibility, impact—so experiments stay grounded.
As John Cutler would note, metrics aren’t bureaucracy; they’re your compass. Define what success looks like at each stage.
Pillars of an AI-Native, Human-Governed Operating Model
To move from “pilot project” to “enterprise habit,” you need more than technology. You need a sociotechnical framework that balances machines and humans across:
Talent & Capabilities
Shift roles from “creators” to “curators” and “editors.”
Upskill people on prompting, data literacy, and AI ethics.
Technology & Data
Build an API-driven architecture so AI agents can plug in seamlessly.
Leverage proprietary data for a unique competitive advantage.
Operating Model
Form self-steering, cross-disciplinary squads empowered to experiment.
Rethink risk: partner with compliance early to enable, not block.
AI Ethics & Sustainability
Draft clear policies on transparency, fairness, and environmental impact.
Code “people-first” criteria into AI decision loops.
AI Governance
Establish an “AI control tower” for continuous oversight.
Embed feedback loops: review models, update as strategy and regulations evolve.
Together, these pillars create a system where AI tools amplify human judgment rather than override it.
The Sociotechnical Heartbeat:
Why Systems, Not Silos, Win
Innovation lives in social systems—the interplay of culture, structure, and technology. You can’t bolt on an AI chatbot and call it a day. You need to cultivate:
Psychological safety so people share half-baked ideas.
Narrative-making, so teams align on vision and measure progress.
Adaptive processes, so you can pivot when experiments fail.
As a disciplined problem-finder, ask: Where are our handoffs creating friction? Which policies are stifling creativity? Then redesign workflows so that AI and humans flow together.
Co-Creating the Future
We stand at an inflection point: AI can offer boundless possibilities, but meaning remains human-made. Organizations that thrive won’t be those that automate fastest; they’ll be those that build the right capability systems—where curiosity meets metrics, imagination meets governance, and every experiment is a step toward a better tomorrow.
The challenge is clear: invest not just in models and servers, but in your people, processes, and philosophy. Ultimately, technology is the spark—but only a human-capability system can stoke the fire of lasting innovation.
Show your support
Every post on Socio-Technical Criteria takes several days of research and (re)writing.
Your support with small gestures (like, reshare, subscribe, comment,…) is hugely appreciated!